Sweatfree
Campaign
As part of the international effort
to end child labor and sweatshops, the New York State Labor-Religion Coalition's
Sweatfree Campaign supports efforts to direct the purchasing power
of schools and governments towards responsible manufacturers of all kinds of uniforms, sports equipment,
logo-bearing items and other apparel. An array of campaign resources
are available below. Contact us to schedule a nuts and bolts training using these materials.
In a hurry? Here are our most frequently requested items: (Adobe Reader, available for free, is necessary to open PDF files.)
• New report—Subsidizing Sweatshops: How our tax dollars fund the race to the bottom, and what cities and states can do from SweatFree Communities. Click here for the LRC news release with a State of New York focus.
• 2008 Consumer Guide for products (including some school apparel and sports equipment). All retailers and wholesalers in the guide have undergone a rigorous application process. The guide is brought to you by SweatFree Communities, Sweatshop Watch and International Labor Rights Forum.
• Code of Conduct Compliance Form
• School District Resolution in Support of the Implementation of Sweatfree Apparel and Sports Equipment Purchasing.
SWEATFREE CAMPAIGN NEWS
Click here for details.
Welcome to Jordan Wells who joined the Labor-Religion Coalition staff as Sweatfree Coordinator in October 2007.
For information about the new sweatfree apparel and textile purchasing policy passed by the Albany Common Council on Dec. 18, 2006, click here.
"Me and My Uniform" is a photo project of SweatFree Communities, a national network of local anti-sweatshop coalitions. Click here for a cool project idea to help connect the dots between workers who sew uniforms and those who wear them.
Northeast Anti-Sweatshop Conference for High School Students, Click here for highlights by Courtney Clifford, Class of 2006, College of St. Rose in Albany NY.
"Sweatfree"
Sports Equipment Bill passes in NY Senate & Assembly
SUNY Cortland joins the Workers Rights Consortium
Anti-sweatshop purchasing
policy passes: Los Angeles Unified
School District
To read about the national impact of the Coalition's campaign, see the February 2003 CorpWatch article, "Sweat-Free Purchasing Resolutions: A New Trend".
RESOURCES
Training
Opportunities
Frequently
Asked Questions
SUNY
Implementation of 2002 Anti-Sweatshop Law
An
overview of antisweatshop organizing from americas.org (June 2002)
2002
Anti-sweatshop Law in NYtext,
background, next steps
Governor
Pataki signs anti-sweatshop law: Associated Press article (from
Newsday, August 9, 2002)
School
Report Card plus news release [June 24, 2002]
New
York State School Boards Association sample policy
Six
Steps to Sweatfree Status in K-12 Schools
Sample
policy statement for K-12 public schools
Sample
petition, full sheet
Sample
petition, palm card
Links
to learn about child labor and sweat shops
Articles
about 2001 legislation
What
we've learned, 1998-2000
Code
of Conduct
Compliance
Forms
NY
K-12 Anti-sweatshop bill text and history
Sweatfree
Schools Poster Contest [last offered in 2002]
Last Updated:03/11/2008
© New York State Labor-Religion Coalition
WHAT WE'VE LEARNED:
1998-2000 NY Sweatfree
Schools Campaign
The New York State Labor-Religion Coalition
launched the Sweatfree Schools Campaign in 1998 and scheduled its completion in
2001.
The Campaign is going strong. Because the Coalition
has received numerous requests for guidance to start local initiatives, we created
an Interim Report on the campaign's progress with a view towards putting into
effect lessons learned thus far.
The New York State Labor-Religion
Coalition is a human rights organization focusing on workplace issues, especially
those that concern low wage workers and their families. The Coalition is dismayed
by the proliferation of sweatshops in this country and abroad, and the unabated
use of workers in servitude, including children.
PURPOSE
The
Sweatfree Schools Campaign is aimed at raising the public's awareness about the
predominant use of sweatshop and child labor in the apparel industry, especially
for clothing used in schools, such as school uniforms and logo-bearing items.
The Campaign recommends that school boards adopt policies
barring the purchase of school apparel made under those conditions, and encourages
local groups to organize and advocate for adoption of these policies.
The
campaign also engages students in asking who makes the clothes they wear and under
what conditions. It offers teachers an opportunity to deal with ethical values
in the classroom when studying history, social studies, art, and other disciplines.
IMPACT
What seems clear at this point is
that the Campaign has engaged thousands of people in the state. The New York Sweatfree
Schools Campaign has received much publicity through stories in the media and
with appearances by Coalition volunteers and staff in classrooms, teacher meetings,
conferences, and other events throughout the state. Different groups in the state
have taken up the issue of advocating for "clean clothes" in the schools,
that is, clothes not made by children or sweat labor.
Many
have endorsed the campaign, from public and non-public school districts to teacher
and religious groups (see list at the end of this Report).
Many
more are at different stages of organizing their own local campaigns. These efforts
include single individuals who write to their school board members urging that
the school board take on the issue. They also involve small groups of parents,
teachers and students developing strategies to get the attention of their school
boards. There are groups of faculty and college students on campuses asking their
administrations to stop contracting with sweatshop-using vendors for the making
of clothes bearing the college's or university's logo.
And
other groups, in their own ways, are taking steps to challenge the pervasive,
and often unthinking, use of school apparel made by sweatshop and child labor.
(A partial list of ongoing efforts is at the end of this Report).
As
the U.S. public becomes more aware that the clothes they wear are made in exploitative
conditions and often with child labor, New York's sweatfree schools initiative
has gained national significance. The New York State Labor-Religion Coalition's
Sweatfree Schools Campaign has drawn the attention of out-of-state organizations
and individuals. For example, it has inspired the establishment of the Minnesota
Sweatfree Schools Campaign and gained support of the National Education Association.
The
New York Sweatfree Schools Campaign was featured by the Child Labor Coalition,
a national organization, at its biannual meeting in June 2000 during an event
hosted by Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) at the Russell Senate Office Building in
Washington, D.C..
ACTIVITY ON UUP CAMPUSES
The
United University Professions(UUP)included in spring semester 2000 a short questionnaire
on sweatfree topics in its publication geared for union leadership. The questionnaire,
produced with the aid of the Coalition, aimed to identify what State University
of New York campuses are actively involved in sweatfree issues.
A
college student intern with the Labor Religion Coalition received confirmation
form those listed below that faculty, staff and students are involved at some
level in the sweatfree movement. This involvement varies from official task forces
that bring together a wide spectrum of campus representatives to campus-based
organizing efforts, informal meetings and teach-ins.
SUNY
Plattsburgh SUNY Fredonia
SUNY Genesse SUNY New Paltz
SUNY Binghamton
SUNY Albany
Because the State University of New York comprises
the nation's largest system of public institutions of higher education, it is
important to know to what degree these campuses are attuned to and active in sweatfree
issues. At present, anti-sweatshop activities stand at the center of the nation's
renewed student movements. Universities and colleges are seeing vigorous interest
on social and ethical issues on the part of students and other constituencies.
Consequently, as a first step, institutions across the
nation are taking action to ensure that clothing and items bearing their logos
are not produced by child or sweatshop labor. Leadership is being provided by
large institutions, such as the University of California System and the University
of Notre Dame, and by smaller ones, such as New York's Bard College and College
of St. Rose. Groups, such as United Students Against Sweatshops (USAS) and the
Workers Rights Consortium (WRC) are mobilizing students and faculties; in turn,
these are pressuring their institutions to deepen their commitment to the ethical
implications of maintaining a system built on sweatshops and child labor.
LESSONS LEARNED
In a survey conducted in 2000 by the Sweatfree
Schools Campaign of different local groups engaged in the Campaign, organizers
had this to say:
On The Most Surprising Thing Learned
"
We had no idea it is such a complex issue.
"The support
for the [sweatfree] concept."
"The diversity of the
coalition (ethnic/constituencies, etc.)"
"That there
is no way to actually achieve sweatfree status despite commitment to do so. This
is an insider's industry indeed."
"The support of
people once they understood."
"That we find no one
[is] truly sweatfree."
On Achievements, Small or
Large
"Achieving resolutions from Board of Education,
Parent Teachers Association, and Civil Service Employees Association (CSEA)."
"Signatures
by 30+ parents; got to address many people on the need for sweatfree schools."
"Education
of two classes of students via lectures, discussions and videotapes."
"We
have given many presentations to school groups and we have the support of our
Bishop, the Superintendent of Catholic Schools, and most of the principals of
these schools."
"Catholic Schools and [local] schools
endorsement."
"Three of our schools are compliant
regarding vendors."
"Public Education through the
media and various constituencies--students, labor, religious community."
On Stumbling Blocks and Handling Them
"The Board needed
more information--for example, 'Who will we use and what is the impact on how
we do business?' Our strategy? We'll help in solving problems and not asking them
to commit beyond their means."
"Can't get the [local]
teachers association president to take a stand; may use the teacher's union [which
endorsed the campaign] to prod this person along."
"Getting
the issue high enough on people's busy agendas to have them take the time needed
to pursue this goal."
"Bad timing on our part--students
graduated before school board decided to act."
"There
are not enough purchasing alternatives known to us as consumers."
On
What to Say to Others Starting Their Campaign
"This is
a campaign that takes persistence. Purchasing habits are very ingrained and alternatives
for sweatfree purchasing do not seem readily available....An important goal for
becoming sweatfree institutions is that this can be publicly declared to the press
and public officials, so that the issue gets heightened visibility to the public
at large."
"When issue is explained and fear of major
cost is dismissed, support is there."
"The process
takes time. People don't get inclined to move on an issue that doesn't affect
their 'backyards'."
"The necessity of laying the
groundwork--bringing in all the necessary partners, building the working relationships,
finding the political officials who are allies at the onset of the campaign, launch
and keep the pressure/interest up."
". . . that the
present clothing industry is in fact a global sweatshop experience even in our
own country. We must keep educating and putting pressure on large companies."
"Work with students and concentrate on the fact that
the only way to improve things is to shed light on this very difficult industry
to reform."
THE STUDENT POSTER CONTEST 2000
As
part of its project, the Sweatfree Schools Campaign conducted its first annual
poster contest among students attending public and non-public schools.
Open
to K through 12 grade students, the contest was announced in the fall of 1999
with a deadline in February 2000. New York State teachers were asked to nominate
posters made by students at their schools dealing with the theme: How does child
labor and sweatshops affect you and your school? Thousands of students took part
in the preliminary activities of the contest in their schools. New York State
teachers sent in nomination more than 200 student entries for final judging.
The poster contest is being underwritten by the New York State United Teachers
(NYSUT). NYSUT awarded savings bonds to the eight students who achieved first
or second place in four grade categories.
The posters of the
first-place winners were displayed for a week in June 2000 in the rotunda of the
Russell Senate Office Building in Washington D.C. as part of an exhibit on child
labor.
New York City's United Federation of Teachers (UFT) also awarded
prizes of savings bonds to New York City students who were selected as first and
second prize winners among the entries from City schools. The posters of these
winners, as well as those of the statewide winners and other poster entries, were
exhibited at the Bread and Roses Gallery (a project of SEIU 1199) on West 43rd
Street during the week of September 25, 2000.
Since those who
have seen the posters have acclaimed the artwork of the student artists, the Coalition
is making available, for a contribution, copies of the first-prize winning poster
in the 10-12 grade category and note cards featuring the wining posters.
An
exhibit of these posters is available to travel. Anyone wishing to host an exhibit
in places such as community centers, libraries, places of worship, schools and
universities, work settings, and other similar places may contact the Coalition.
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES AHEAD
During
this campaign, three issues have emerged as the most challenging:
There
are few options for purchasing full uniforms for K-12 students that come from
entirely sweatfree sources. Local organizers discovered that parts of the uniform
were produced off-shore and that they had no way of ascertaining under what conditions
these items were manufactured.
There is no easy way to
divide vendors into "good guys" and "bad guys."
While
everyone asks for such a list, the reality with manufacturers and apparel vendors
is far more entangled. The apparel industry is best seen as a continuum, with
some companies taking more seriously than others the treatment of workers and
issues such as safety, fairness, and wages. A useful approach in talking about
this industry may be borrowed from Co-op America Quarterly which describes companies
as being in the bottom rung, middle rung, or top rung of the ladder of social
responsibility.
There is as yet no widespread political support
for confronting the issue of sweatshop and child labor if it means upsetting the
way contracts are being bid in the state. By law, state entities such as public
schools, City University of New York, and State University of New York, must take
"the lowest responsible bidder" on contracts for which bidding is required.
At least nine anti-sweatshop bills have been introduced in the New York State
Legislature. Several of these bills were given some consideration by the Legislature,
among them one to modify municipal law that would have targeted bidders using
sweatshop-generated products. UPDATE: The NYS Senate and Assembly passed legislation
removing this barrier! On Labor Day, September 3, 2001, governor George Pataki
signed Sweatfree Schools legislation into law.
If challenges
are conceived as opportunities, then those who back the Sweatfree Schools Campaign
may consider any or all of the following actions:
1. Keep
informed. Read, watch, and listen to reports on sweatshops and child labor. The
National Labor Committee and UNITE, the union of needletrades, industrial and
textile employees, have publications with specific information on who is using
sweatshop labor, where these factories are, and what is being manufactured. The
web sites of USAS, United Students Against Sweatshops, and the WRC, the Workers
Rights Consortium, offer information. Our own web site will soon be bringing more
timely information about the anti-sweatshop movement and links to other useful
sites.
Television magazines such as Sixty Minutes continue
to present stories about the issue. Videos, by groups such as the American Federation
of Teachers (AFT), provide information that may be used for instructional purposes.
Newsletters, such as the one published by The Child Labor Coalition in Washington,
D.C.
In whatever way is best for you, find out about these
issues.
2. Tell your retailers and vendors. When you are in
a store that sells goods manufactured with sweatshop or child labor, tell the
manager that you will not purchase that particular item and why. When purchasing
something with a label that is reputed to be the product of good working conditions,
tell the manager that you are doing so because you are a consumer who pays attention
to that. You don't have to do this each and every time, but when you have a little
extra time, let retailers know what is important to you. Would you have knowingly
purchased materials produced from Holocaust victims? Tell your vendors that you
want products that have been produced in fair working conditions.
Ask
your vendors to abide by a code of conduct , and show your willingness to help
them achieve sweatfree status.
3. Pay living wages. If you
are an employer, pay a living wage to your employees. It may be less costly than
you think. Find out about economic studies on living wages and discover how such
a step will impact you. You will realize that this decision is more than an economic
decision; the effects will be felt beyond the dollars and cents. Be a factor in
heightening the quality of life in your community and in bringing workers and
their families to self sufficiency.
4. Organize. Two or three
informed and caring people can accomplish much. Get a small group working on finding
solutions and prepared yourself to be energized. There are many such efforts going
on in the state, and most of them involve individuals of different generations,
from teenagers to Boomers to the Second World War generation. Make presentations
before school boards; ask them for resolutions endorsing the campaign , or encourage
them to set up subcommittees to review the issues and come up with a resolution.
Contact your state legislators (Senator and Assemblyperson) and ask what they
will be doing during the next session to adopt anti-sweatshop legislation. Write
to the editor of your local paper,or better, call him or her and ask for stories
on these issues. Explain that you are astonished more stories and commentaries
are not appearing on the issues of sweatshops, child labor, corporate globalization
and a living wage. Join with students at your local college or university to become
more knowledgeable about these issues and to build coalitions for strategic actions.
Finally, support the New York State Labor-Religion Coalition's
work with your contribution. Contributors receive regular information about events
and developments, but as important, you will know that you are advancing the advocacy
of sweatfree schools. Our phone number is 518-213-6000, ext.6305, if you'd like
to discuss different ways of contributing.
Endorsers of Sweatfree
Schools Campaign as of October 2000
Suffolk County
United University Professions
National Education Association of New York
Board of Education, City Schools
of Albany
Board of Education, Central Islip Public Schools
Board of Education,
Patchogue Medford Union Free School District
Albany Roman Catholic Diocesan
Schools
Fulton Teachers Association
Troy School District
Justice and
Peace Advisory Council
Westhill District Education Association
Port Jefferson
teachers Association
Buffalo Roman Catholic Diocesan Schools
Board of
Education, Hamburg School District
Nassau BOCES Central Council of Teachers
Statewide Senior Action Council
Western New York Peace Center
Newburgh
Teachers Association
NYSUT Retirees of Western New York
Central Trades
and Labor Council of the counties of Jefferson, Lewis and Lawrence (submitted
by UUP Chapter)
Central Islip PTA Council
Niskayuna Central School District
New York State Division of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, (representing
48 congregations)
University at Albany Student Association
College of
St. Rose, Albany
Civil Service Association (CSEA)--State Affiliate
Organizing
Efforts in Progress, October 2000
Three Village School district, parents group
Northport School District, high school students, teachers, parents
Great Neck
High School, teachers and students
Syracuse University, students
Guilderland
School district, grassroots group
Saugerties School District, students and
grassroots group
State University of New York, various initiatives by students,
faculty and others
University at Albany, student-faculty efforts led to Presidential
Task Force
St. John's University, administration
Schenectady Schools,
grassroots group
Cincinnatus Schools, students and teachers
Interim Report by Laudelina Martinez, October, 2000